FAR Part 12 commercial acquisition often enables the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to deliver:

Icon of a plane flying over a globe

Advanced technology

Icon of a clock suggesting less time

In less time

Icon of a dollar sign inside a down-facing arrow, representing less cost

For lower cost

Download our infographic

For close to three decades, the U.S. Congress and the Department of Defense (DoD) have recognized that government acquisition of commercial products and services for defense applications can increase competition, reduce costs and expand access to new technologies, processes and products.

Commercially developed products and services – particularly those determined as commercial “of a type” through the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12 framework – bring considerable advantages to the DoD and to taxpayers.

Under FAR Part 12, as long as a product is “of a type” that is currently commercial, then the DoD should classify the product as commercial. The military version of the commercial product can be designed slightly differently, but if it is “of a type” – or similar to – then it should be a commercial product.

Once a product obtains a favorable commercial determination, the DoD can rapidly deploy this advanced technology and ongoing product enhancements to the warfighter. This helps reduce costs by leveraging commercial investments in R&D that are typically funded by the U.S. Government under the traditional FAR Part 15 acquisition process.

This allows for easier and less expensive upgrades, mitigating obsolescence, and reduces barriers to entry into the U.S. government marketplace, increasing competition and available solutions.

FAR Part 12 vs. FAR Part 15

  FAR Part 12 FAR Part 15
USG cost of upgrades Iconic representation of money Iconic representation of money
USG cost of R&D Iconic representation of money Iconic representation of money
USG cost of obsolescence Iconic representation of money Iconic representation of money
Cost to taxpayers Iconic representation of money Iconic representation of money
Access to new technology + -
Ease of upgrades + -
Competition + -

For FAR Part 12, "substantially less cost" than FAR 15 is not the same as "no cost."

History of Commerciality

Congressional and DoD Effort began with Section 800 Panel Report of 1993

The purpose of their commercial item recommendations was to draw new firms to the defense market AND enable firms to integrate their commercial and military production, which in turn enables the DoD to fulfill its mission by obtaining greater access to the latest commercial technologies.

  • 1994: Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA)
    • Subsequently enacted laws mandated a preference for the acquisition of commercial products and services under streamlined procedures
  • 1996: Federal Acquisition Reform (Clinger-Cohen) Act
  • 2004: Services Acquisition Reform Act
  • FY2016, FY2017, FY2018, and FY2022: National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs)
  • 2019: A Section 809 Panel report proposed further changes to improve the current commercial item acquisition process, to include adding the use of commercial processes into the FAR definition of commercial

Despite decades of work by legislators, DoD officials and the aerospace and defense industry, DoD acquisition of commercial innovation has become increasingly challenging. In fact, in 2014, nearly a decade ago, the Defense Business Board confirmed that the entire industry’s ability to provide the DoD with leading-edge commercial technology was under increasing threat.

This is due in part to an approach from some lawmakers, oversight bodies, and members of the DoD workforce that take an unnecessarily narrows view of the commercial definitions, in contrast to Congressional assertions that the definitions are to be interpreted broadly.

At Collins, we believe that the DoD should be advocating for its workforce to take a broader interpretation of commercial “of a type” products and services in order to ensure the latest technology gets to the warfighter in a rapid, cost-effective manner

FAR Part 12 in action

Chinook CH-47F Cockpit

Collins commercial “of a type” Common Avionics Architecture System (CAAS) saved the Pentagon over $160 million, applied over 20 years and $300 million in commercial development, and was delivered in just 13 months vs. 24 - 36 months.

Common Avionics Architecture System
Boeing C-17

Collins commercial “of a type” (military application) Integrated Landing Systems (ILS) took advantage of $40 million worth of previous investments from our commercial ILS.

AH-64 Apache helicopter

The Collins commercial “of a type” Integrated Vehicle Health Management Unit (IVHMU) applied $10 million in private development investment, reducing costs for the U.S. Government and taxpayers. It also provides IVHMU in a smaller, lighter and more functional form and reduces two line-replaceable units down to only one.

Waiting in the wings

Solutions that could benefit the warfighter now through use of FAR Part 12 procedures & broader acceptance of dual-use commercial technology by "of a type" and other commercial classifications

Icon representing composites
Composites and advanced materials technology
Plus sign representing health
Predictive health management
Icon of a flame
Fire protection
Icon of a lighting bolt representing electricity
Electrical power generating systems
Icon representation of a person sitting in an aircraft cabin seat
Seating technology
Icon of a valve
Fuel valves